Skip to main content

Backtest window 2016-05-02 to 2026-10-26 · Data as of 2026-10-27

US momentum breadth timing (leveraged ETFs)

Uses 12-1 momentum breadth (above 8%) across the 500 most liquid US stocks plus a QQQ trend filter. In risk-on months it adds TQQQ and TECL next to the strongest defensive ETF (about 25% / 25% / 50%); in risk-off months it holds only the strongest of IEF, GLD and SHY. Monthly rebalance, 8% stop. May 2016 to October 2026: 29.9% CAGR, daily Sharpe 1.40, max drawdown -21.1%, vs QQQ total return 20.7%, 0.95 and -35.1% over the same dates. Passes all three robustness checks: neighbouring parameters, both halves of the backtest, and 0.1% per-side trading costs.

Disclaimer: for education only, not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results, and investing involves risk.

Backtest performance

CAGR
29.9%
Daily Sharpe
1.40
Max drawdown
-21.1%
Total return
1457%

The backtest charges no commissions or taxes (the finlab sim() default for U.S. stocks), and the daily Sharpe ratio does not subtract a risk-free rate. The equity curve starts on the first date the strategy's data is available (2016-05-02).

Equity curve (log scale)

US momentum breadth timing (leveraged ETFs) vs QQQ buy-and-hold (total return)
1x2x3x5x8x12x2016-05-022018-01-232019-10-172021-07-152023-04-112025-01-272026-10-26
US momentum breadth timing (leveraged ETFs)QQQ buy-and-hold (total return)

Compared with QQQ buy-and-hold (total return)

PortfolioCAGRDaily SharpeMax drawdownWindow
US momentum breadth timing (leveraged ETFs)29.9%1.40-21.1%2016-05-02 to 2026-10-26
QQQ buy-and-hold (total return)20.7%0.95-35.1%2016-05-02 to 2026-10-26

Full strategy code

Install the finlab package and run it as is (finlab.login() walks you through sign-in, no token needed). For AI-assisted setup and a first backtest, follow the setup guide.

Show code (strategy.py)
"""US cross-sectional momentum -> leveraged-ETF regime strategy (FinLab).

The screen runs on the full liquid US universe; the tradable position is a small
basket of leveraged growth ETFs that is only held when stock-level momentum
breadth and the QQQ trend are both positive. Reproduces the backtest in the
article. Complete the AI-assisted setup flow at https://finlab.finance/en/setup before running this file.

    python strategy.py              # backtest
    python strategy.py --validate   # robustness checks from the article
"""
import sys

import finlab
from finlab import data
from finlab.backtest import sim
from finlab.dataframe import FinlabDataFrame

RISK_ASSETS = ["TQQQ", "TECL"]            # leveraged growth ETFs (held in risk-on)
DEFENSIVE_ASSETS = ["IEF", "GLD", "SHY"]  # treasuries / gold / cash-like (risk-off)


def liquid_universe(close, raw_close, volume, top_n=500, min_price=10, min_dollar_volume=10_000_000):
    """Point-in-time top-N universe by 60-day dollar volume, with price and
    data-quality gates so the backtest can only pick names it could trade.
    Volume is not split-adjusted, so dollar volume and the price floor use the
    unadjusted close (adjusted close x volume overstates reverse-split names)."""
    dollar_volume = (raw_close * volume).rolling(60, min_periods=20).mean()
    top_liquid = dollar_volume.is_largest(top_n)
    liquid_enough = dollar_volume > min_dollar_volume
    price_ok = raw_close > min_price

    # Drop names for a year after any single-day move >= 50% (split/data artifacts).
    returns = close.pct_change()
    extreme = returns.abs() >= 0.50
    recently_bad = extreme.rolling(252, min_periods=1).max().shift(1).fillna(False) > 0
    return top_liquid & liquid_enough & price_ok & (~recently_bad.astype(bool))


def build_position(breadth_threshold=0.08, trend_window=200):
    data.set_market("us")
    close = data.get("us_price:adj_close")
    raw_close = data.get("us_price:close")
    volume = data.get("us_price:volume")
    fund_close = data.get("us_fund_price:adj_close")[["QQQ"] + RISK_ASSETS + DEFENSIVE_ASSETS]

    # 1. Liquid universe + the 12-month-minus-1-month momentum factor.
    universe = liquid_universe(close, raw_close, volume)
    ret_12m = close / close.shift(252) - 1
    ret_1m = close / close.shift(21) - 1
    momentum = ret_12m - ret_1m

    # 2. Breadth: share of the universe that are top-decile, positive-trend leaders.
    leaders = (momentum[universe].rank(axis=1, pct=True) > 0.90) & (ret_12m > 0)
    breadth = leaders.sum(axis=1) / universe.sum(axis=1)

    # 3. Risk-on regime: broad momentum AND QQQ above its 200-day with positive 126-day trend.
    qqq_trend = fund_close["QQQ"] > fund_close["QQQ"].rolling(trend_window, min_periods=trend_window // 2).mean()
    qqq_mom = fund_close["QQQ"] / fund_close["QQQ"].shift(126) - 1
    risk_on = (breadth > breadth_threshold) & (qqq_trend & (qqq_mom > 0)).reindex(breadth.index)
    risk_on = risk_on.reindex(fund_close.index).fillna(False)

    # 4. Risk-off: 1 defensive ETF. Risk-on: the 2 strongest leveraged ETFs are added
    #    next to the defensive ETF (risk_on is an object column after reindex/fillna,
    #    so ~risk_on does not switch it off); the book ends up about 25% TQQQ,
    #    25% TECL and 50% defensive. The article's numbers are for this behaviour.
    risk_score = FinlabDataFrame(fund_close[RISK_ASSETS].pct_change(126))
    defensive_score = FinlabDataFrame(
        fund_close[DEFENSIVE_ASSETS].pct_change(63) - fund_close[DEFENSIVE_ASSETS].pct_change(21)
    )
    risky = risk_score.is_largest(2) & risk_on.to_frame().reindex(risk_score.index).iloc[:, 0]
    risky = risky.astype(float).div(risky.astype(float).sum(axis=1), axis=0).fillna(0)
    defensive = (
        defensive_score.is_largest(1) & (~risk_on).to_frame().reindex(defensive_score.index).iloc[:, 0]
    ).astype(float)

    position = (
        risky.reindex(fund_close.index).fillna(0)
        .join(defensive.reindex(fund_close.index).fillna(0), how="outer")
        .fillna(0)
        .T.groupby(level=0).max().T
    )
    return position.loc["2016-01-01":]


def run_backtest(position, fee_ratio=None):
    data.set_market("us_fund")
    return sim(
        position,
        resample="M",           # rebalance monthly
        position_limit=1,       # max weight PER asset (1.0 = 100%); the holdings and
                                # weights come from build_position() (see step 4 there)
        stop_loss=0.08,         # 8% touched stop on the ETF leg
        touched_exit=True,
        trade_at_price="close",
        fee_ratio=fee_ratio,    # None = finlab's US default (0 commission, 0 tax)
        upload=False,
    )


# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Robustness checks behind the article's validation section:
#     python strategy.py --validate
# "Beats QQQ" means a higher daily Sharpe than buying and holding QQQ
# (dividend-adjusted) over exactly the same dates.
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
COST_PER_SIDE = 0.001  # 0.1% per buy and per sell, for spread and slippage


def daily_sharpe(equity):
    returns = equity.pct_change().dropna()
    return returns.mean() / returns.std() * 252 ** 0.5


def sharpe_vs_qqq(equity):
    qqq = data.get("us_fund_price:adj_close")["QQQ"].reindex(equity.index).ffill()
    return daily_sharpe(equity), daily_sharpe(qqq)


def validate():
    # 1. Neighbouring parameters: the original value and one step either side.
    wins = 0
    for breadth_threshold in (0.06, 0.08, 0.10):
        for trend_window in (150, 200, 250):
            report = run_backtest(build_position(breadth_threshold, trend_window))
            strategy, qqq = sharpe_vs_qqq(report.creturn)
            wins += strategy > qqq
            print(f"breadth>{breadth_threshold:.2f} QQQ>{trend_window}d MA: "
                  f"Sharpe {strategy:.2f} vs QQQ {qqq:.2f}")
    print(f"{wins}/9 parameter sets beat QQQ")

    # 2. First half and second half of the backtest, each on its own.
    equity = run_backtest(build_position()).creturn
    middle = equity.index[len(equity) // 2]
    for label, part in (("first half", equity.loc[:middle]), ("second half", equity.loc[middle:])):
        strategy, qqq = sharpe_vs_qqq(part)
        print(f"{label} {part.index[0].date()} to {part.index[-1].date()}: "
              f"Sharpe {strategy:.2f} vs QQQ {qqq:.2f}")

    # 3. Trading costs: finlab's US default is zero, so charge 0.1% per side.
    report = run_backtest(build_position(), fee_ratio=COST_PER_SIDE)
    strategy, qqq = sharpe_vs_qqq(report.creturn)
    print(f"with 0.1% per side: CAGR {report.get_stats()['cagr']:.1%}, "
          f"Sharpe {strategy:.2f} vs QQQ {qqq:.2f}")


def main():
    finlab.login()  # finlab guides you through login automatically
    if "--validate" in sys.argv:
        validate()
        return
    report = run_backtest(build_position())
    print(report.get_stats())
    report.display()


if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

Download strategy.py Download data.csv (equity curve)

Reproduce this strategy in FinLab Studio

Adjust the rules and rerun the backtest on the same real data in Studio.

The strategies and backtest results on this page are for education and research only; see the Terms of Service.