美股低波動擇時(2 倍槓桿 ETF)
QQQ 站上 200 日均線且 126 日報酬為正時,持有 QLD、SSO 中動能較強的一檔;否則持有 IEF、GLD、SHY 中最強的一檔。月換股、6% 停損。2016 年 5 月至 2026 年 10 月回測年化報酬 29.3%、日夏普 1.29、最大回撤 -22.2%;同視窗 QQQ 含息年化 20.7%、日夏普 0.95、最大回撤 -35.1%。鄰近參數、前後兩段、每邊 0.1% 交易成本三項驗證皆通過。
投資警語:本文僅供教學參考,不構成投資建議。過去績效不代表未來表現,投資有風險。
回測績效
- 年化報酬率
- 29.3%
- 日夏普
- 1.29
- 最大回撤
- -22.2%
- 總報酬率
- 1377%
回測不計手續費與交易稅(finlab 套件 sim() 的美股預設成本),日夏普未扣無風險利率。策略淨值自資料可得日(2016-05-02)起算。
淨值曲線(對數座標)
美股低波動擇時(2 倍槓桿 ETF)QQQ 買進持有(含息)
與 QQQ 買進持有(含息)對照
| 對象 | 年化報酬率 | 日夏普 | 最大回撤 | 統計視窗 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 美股低波動擇時(2 倍槓桿 ETF) | 29.3% | 1.29 | -22.2% | 2016-05-02 〜 2026-10-26 |
| QQQ 買進持有(含息) | 20.7% | 0.95 | -35.1% | 2016-05-02 〜 2026-10-26 |
完整策略程式碼
安裝 finlab 套件後即可直接執行重現(finlab.login() 會自動引導登入,不需手動填 token)。想用 AI 輔助安裝與跑第一次回測,可以走安裝教學。
展開程式碼(strategy.py)
"""US low-volatility defensive compounder -> moderate-leverage ETF strategy (FinLab).
A trend/momentum regime filter on QQQ decides between two books: in risk-on it
holds the stronger of two 2x leveraged index ETFs (QLD / SSO); in risk-off it
rotates into the strongest defensive ETF (IEF / GLD / SHY). Using 2x instead of
3x leverage lowers volatility drag and path dependency. Reproduces the backtest
in the article. Complete the AI-assisted setup flow at https://finlab.finance/en/setup before running this file.
python strategy.py # backtest
python strategy.py --validate # robustness checks from the article
"""
import sys
import finlab
from finlab import data
from finlab.backtest import sim
from finlab.dataframe import FinlabDataFrame
RISK_ASSETS = ["QLD", "SSO"] # 2x leveraged index ETFs (held in risk-on)
DEFENSIVE_ASSETS = ["IEF", "GLD", "SHY"] # treasuries / gold / cash-like (risk-off)
def build_position(trend_window=200, momentum_window=126):
data.set_market("us_fund")
close = data.get("us_fund_price:adj_close")[["QQQ"] + RISK_ASSETS + DEFENSIVE_ASSETS]
# 1. Risk-on regime: QQQ above its 200-day average AND positive 126-day return.
qqq_trend = close["QQQ"] > close["QQQ"].rolling(trend_window, min_periods=trend_window // 2).mean()
qqq_momentum = close["QQQ"] / close["QQQ"].shift(momentum_window) - 1
risk_on = qqq_trend & (qqq_momentum > 0)
# 2. In risk-on: hold the stronger 2x ETF by 189-day-minus-21-day momentum.
risk_score = FinlabDataFrame(
close[RISK_ASSETS].pct_change(189) - close[RISK_ASSETS].pct_change(21)
)
risky = risk_score.is_largest(1) & risk_on.to_frame().reindex(risk_score.index).iloc[:, 0]
# 3. In risk-off: hold the strongest defensive ETF by 63-day-minus-21-day momentum.
defensive_score = FinlabDataFrame(
close[DEFENSIVE_ASSETS].pct_change(63) - close[DEFENSIVE_ASSETS].pct_change(21)
)
defensive = (
defensive_score.is_largest(1) & (~risk_on).to_frame().reindex(defensive_score.index).iloc[:, 0]
)
position = (
risky.reindex(close.index).fillna(False).astype(float)
.join(defensive.reindex(close.index).fillna(False).astype(float), how="outer")
.fillna(0)
.T.groupby(level=0).max().T
)
return position.loc["2016-01-01":]
def run_backtest(position, fee_ratio=None):
data.set_market("us_fund")
return sim(
position,
resample="M", # rebalance monthly
position_limit=1, # max weight per asset; the strategy holds 1 ETF at a time
stop_loss=0.06, # 6% touched stop on the held ETF
touched_exit=True,
trade_at_price="close",
fee_ratio=fee_ratio, # None = finlab's US default (0 commission, 0 tax)
upload=False,
)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Robustness checks behind the article's validation section:
# python strategy.py --validate
# "Beats QQQ" means a higher daily Sharpe than buying and holding QQQ
# (dividend-adjusted) over exactly the same dates.
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
COST_PER_SIDE = 0.001 # 0.1% per buy and per sell, for spread and slippage
def daily_sharpe(equity):
returns = equity.pct_change().dropna()
return returns.mean() / returns.std() * 252 ** 0.5
def sharpe_vs_qqq(equity):
qqq = data.get("us_fund_price:adj_close")["QQQ"].reindex(equity.index).ffill()
return daily_sharpe(equity), daily_sharpe(qqq)
def validate():
# 1. Neighbouring parameters: the original value and one step either side.
wins = 0
for trend_window in (150, 200, 250):
for momentum_window in (63, 126, 189):
report = run_backtest(build_position(trend_window=trend_window, momentum_window=momentum_window))
strategy, qqq = sharpe_vs_qqq(report.creturn)
wins += strategy > qqq
print(f"QQQ>{trend_window}d MA {momentum_window}d momentum: Sharpe {strategy:.2f} vs QQQ {qqq:.2f}")
print(f"{wins}/9 parameter sets beat QQQ")
# 2. First half and second half of the backtest, each on its own.
equity = run_backtest(build_position()).creturn
middle = equity.index[len(equity) // 2]
for label, part in (("first half", equity.loc[:middle]), ("second half", equity.loc[middle:])):
strategy, qqq = sharpe_vs_qqq(part)
print(f"{label} {part.index[0].date()} to {part.index[-1].date()}: "
f"Sharpe {strategy:.2f} vs QQQ {qqq:.2f}")
# 3. Trading costs: finlab's US default is zero, so charge 0.1% per side.
report = run_backtest(build_position(), fee_ratio=COST_PER_SIDE)
strategy, qqq = sharpe_vs_qqq(report.creturn)
print(f"with 0.1% per side: CAGR {report.get_stats()['cagr']:.1%}, "
f"Sharpe {strategy:.2f} vs QQQ {qqq:.2f}")
def main():
finlab.login() # finlab guides you through login automatically
if "--validate" in sys.argv:
validate()
return
report = run_backtest(build_position())
print(report.get_stats())
report.display()
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
在 Studio 裡用同一套真實資料調整條件、重跑回測。