Skip to main content

IESC IES Holdings, Inc.

Industrials

steady quality, fair valuation.

Quality
Above avg
Valuation
Fair
Key signals
Top-quintile 6-month momentum Filed revenue acceleration
317.16
317.16 Close (USD) Loading candles…

Is IES Holdings, Inc. a buy? Fundamentals and valuation first

  • Quality is above average. Operating margin sits near the 61th percentile. TTM ROE is about 37.1%.

  • Valuation is middle-of-pack. TTM P/E is near the 65th percentile.

  • Recent volatility is elevated. 60-day annualized volatility is in the 88th percentile. Average 20-day dollar volume is about $85.2M.

  • Signals are active now. Top-quintile 6-month momentum, Filed revenue acceleration currently holds; the tables below show what followed in this stock’s own history.

Watchlist

This page refreshes daily after the close. Add IES Holdings, Inc. to your watchlist to track signal changes on your next visit.

Historical evidence

Signals active now

Each active condition is tested against this stock’s own history and benchmarked versus the S&P 500.

Top-quintile 6-month momentum

Active · now 85.76271186440678%

The stock ranks in the top 20% of the liquid US common-stock universe by 126-day adjusted return.

26 historical occurrences (since 2016-07-12)
Average forward return after Top-quintile 6-month momentum。20-day: Win 52%, Sample 25, Median +2.21%, Excess +2.04%, Beat mkt rate 52%；60-day: Win 79.2%, Sample 24, Median +13.49%, Excess +10.53%, Beat mkt rate 70.8%；120-day: Win 79.2%, Sample 24, Median +25.9%, Excess +22.23%, Beat mkt rate 75%

120 days after: historical avg +29.94%

20-day +2.81%
60-day +14.02%
120-day +29.94%
20-day
60-day
120-day
Win
52%
79.2%
79.2%
Sample
25
24
24
Median
+2.21%
+13.49%
+25.9%
Excess
+2.04%
+10.53%
+22.23%
Beat mkt rate
52%
70.8%
75%

Over 24 occurrences, 120-day forward avg gained 29.94%, beat the market by 22.23 pts; win rate 79.2%.

Filed revenue acceleration

Active · now 22.657012873946236%

TTM revenue growth is at least 10% and improved versus the prior filed quarter; event date is the SEC filing date.

15 historical occurrences (since 2019-02-05)
Average forward return after Filed revenue acceleration。20-day: Win 60%, Sample 15, Median +1.4%, Excess -1.63%, Beat mkt rate 53.3%；60-day: Win 50%, Sample 14, Median +0.98%, Excess -3.18%, Beat mkt rate 42.9%；120-day: Win 57.1%, Sample 14, Median +4.86%, Excess +4.92%, Beat mkt rate 50%

120 days after: historical avg +7.74%

20-day -0.91%
60-day -1.88%
120-day +7.74%
20-day
60-day
120-day
Win
60%
50%
57.1%
Sample
15
14
14
Median
+1.4%
+0.98%
+4.86%
Excess
-1.63%
-3.18%
+4.92%
Beat mkt rate
53.3%
42.9%
50%

Over 14 occurrences, 120-day forward avg gained 7.74%, beat the market by 4.92 pts; win rate 57.1%.

Valuation regime and forward returns

Daily TTM P/E is converted into an expanding own-history percentile, then grouped into five valuation regimes. Forward returns use adjusted prices over the next 240 trading days.

PE percentile bandSample days240-day avg returnMedianWin rateAvg excess (vs index)
0-20 0Insufficient data
20-40 You are here143+51.8% +50.4% 79.7% +49.3%
40-60 160+106.1% +146.5% 63.7% +96%
60-80 431+96.9% +111% 76.6% +85%
80-100 482+66.2% +71% 82.8% +50.5%

Quarterly EPS is aligned by SEC filing date before it is forward-filled to daily prices. The expanding percentile uses only information available up to each day.

Current TTM P/E is about 14.09, placing it in the 21.5 own-history percentile, inside the 20-40 bucket.

Valuation × momentum analogs

Each historical day is grouped by own-history P/E tercile and 60-day momentum direction, then tested for the next 120-trading-day adjusted return.

Valuation
Momentum
Cheap (own-history bottom third)
Middle
Expensive (own-history top third)
60-day momentum up
Insufficient data
(0d)
+31.2%
Win rate 74.5% Excess +27.8%
137d
+34.2%
Win rate 83% Excess +26.2%
828d
60-day momentum down
Now
0%
Win rate 46.1% Excess +4.6%
115d
+52.4%
Win rate 72.9% Excess +44.8%
140d
+31.2%
Win rate 62.9% Excess +24.4%
116d

Currently in “Cheap (own-history bottom third) × 60-day momentum down”: across 115 historical days, 120-day forward avg declined 0%, win rate 46.1%, beat the market by 4.6%.

Days = trading days in this bucket; returns use adjusted prices, ex-costs. 60-day momentum: direction of this stock's price over the past 60 trading days.

Market-wide momentum baseline

Across 98,498 liquid US common-stock samples, top-quintile 6-month momentum was followed by an average 60-trading-day return of +6.12%, a 57.9% positive-return rate, and +2.77 percentage points of average excess return versus the S&P 500.

Baseline: weekly samples since 2016 where a liquid US common stock ranked in the top quintile by 126-trading-day momentum. Forward return is 60 trading days; excess return is versus S&P 500 (^GSPC).

Signals not active now

Inactive signals still show the stock-specific historical forward-return distribution for context.

52-week adjusted-price high

Pending

Adjusted close first reaches a 252-trading-day high; repeated hits within 20 days count once.

25 times historically; 60-day forward avg +10.1%, win rate 66.7%, beating the market by +6.12 pts on average.

EPS surprise beat

Pending

Reported EPS beat consensus estimate by at least 5%; event date is the earnings-surprise timestamp.

Continue researching IES Holdings, Inc. with the evidence above.

Continue in Studio ↗

Method and limits

  • Returns use us_price:adj_close, adjusted for splits and dividends where available.
  • Excess returns use world_index:^GSPC as the S&P 500 benchmark proxy.
  • Quarterly fundamentals are aligned to SEC filing dates before daily valuation studies.
  • The promoted universe starts from active NYSE/NASDAQ common stocks, then applies price and dollar-volume gates.
  • Snapshot-only tables such as analyst consensus, DCF, us_ratios, and us_key_metrics are intentionally excluded from historical evidence.
  • Overlapping event windows are descriptive distributions, not independent samples.

This page is for historical data analysis and education only. It is not investment advice. Backtests and historical return distributions do not predict future performance; evaluate risk independently before trading.